Tuesday, 29 November 2011

DRAFT Evaluation Question 1 RUPERT

Throughout the creation of the joint project; that of our media video we firstly tried to stick to as many conventions as possible, aware of the fact that this is what makes a professional piece of work we then moved parts of this process forward by allowing our own creativity to take these conventions to new areas and to put our own creative swing into the video.
The Mise en Scene of the music video is the first convention noticeable within our production. The opening shot of the band entering the garage helps lay the foundation for the genre of the song we have used.  Along shot allows the band to be seen together whilst the efficiency with which they pick up their instruments and settle in preparation to perform shows that there is a job to be done. Indirectly linking to the post-apocalyptic feel we created via the idea that life is on a day to day basis and that surfing is a just a job to be completed.
The lighting; is again something which helps establish a mood; the bright orange is reminiscent of firelight, linking to the theme of survival which has been established.
The beginning of the video has no narrative; hence why the only thing established by the opening shots is who the band is. This is something that was important to use when planning the production due to the length of the song. We wanted an aspect of the song to continue being post-apocalyptic whilst not linking to the narrative formed in the choruses of the song. We left the instrumentals and verses to simply remain illustrative of a band playing music. For this I was influenced by the video of Many of Horror by Biffy Clyro. Whilst there is no narrative to the video I was intrigued by how they kept the song performing in just one location and wanted to take this convention of music videos and apply to our own production.
The conventions of a video being either Illustrative, Amplification of disjunctive was a convention that we directly stuck to by allowing our music video to take elements of the illustrative genre and create something from them. For example we took the illustrative genre and applied it to the garage scenes, providing images of the band playing the song and singing lyrics, just like in the Biffy Clyro video. However we then challenged this convention and pushed it further by creating a simple narrative with it by moving locations to both the hill and the warehouse. Creating a definite survival and post-apocalyptic feel to the video. The miss en scene provided for this by the fallen leaves and the grey sky.
It was in this way that our music video challenged the congenital ways of music videos. For example the use of three locations challenged the way many videos use just the one. The use of these multiple locations was intentionally used add detail to the video and to help the feel of a post-apocalyptic video.
A second convention of a music video is that of band performance. To be able to show effective instrument playing and lip syncing. Whilst this convention is challenged in some videos, even Muses' own for Hysteria, I felt it was important to use because of the length of the song and the video would need to be padded out with something and band performance was key to doing this. We took care in creating a realistic reproduction of the song and this was helped by the time taken before production to learn the song on both guitar and bass. Whilst this doesn't directly challenge convention it does adhere to it and allowed us to create a professional band performance. This was done by careful production over to drafts. Something which was key to this was to include an element that the band was truly playing by incorporating shots of the band rocking together. This is commonly scene in music videos.
We tried to include a variety of camera shots to increase the pace of editing to something which would resemble a conventional indie-rock music video. Editing on the beat provided pace to our video which worked well with the performance aspect of the song. Editing on the beat enabled us to do a variety of things. Firstly we needed different camera shots. Editing on the drum beat meant that we needed clear views of the drum performance and this allowed us to film from behind the drums, providing a diverse selection of shots, allowing our video to use a convention of normal videos. It secondly allowed for the Mise en Scene of the video to be clearly shown. Such as when the singing in the warehouse cuts from long shot to mid shot and the ghostly look of the lead singer can be seen. We developed this convention by reducing it sure. It was not used for very cut as the song was to long; it was however used for important beats, namely drums parts and thus becomes obvious in the video. It can be seen therefore that we challenged this convention to try and display the careful editing that runs through the video.
The pace of editing was then slowed drastically by lengthy shots of the singer singing the lyrics. Allowing the convention of close ups to be used to show the in sync editing.
We used an effect named 'Old world" on the shots of Croft Hill and the warehouse, allowing the transition from verse to chorus to be seen clearly and also to add a sense of an apocalyptic world to the video. Whilst we changed this lighting here we left the lighting in the garage as it was when it was filmed as it created dynamic shadows, something which again I liked in the Many of Horror video by Biffy Clyro.
We used fades at the beginning and end of the video as we liked how it introduced the band but then allowed the video to end in time with the gradual fade of the music.

Class Feedback on Final Draft Video

In class we viewed each others music videos and anonymously gave constructive criticism and commented on points we thought were good within the product. We then left a mark out of ten which we felt the product deserved.

Having received the feedback from the class on our open product we were pleased. We were given generous marks out of 10, and points which bolstered confidence in our video.

We were given six 9/10 marks which whilst we weren't expecting this gave us confidence that we had a created a passable product. Many points were given which suggested our video ticked boxes which we hoped it would be able to. For example comments were made on the use of locations being effective to our genre of music, comments suggested it fitted the 'darkness' of the song.

We received comments on the effectiveness of the variety of shots that we tried purposely to include. we did this to try and keep pace to the song and create something that the target audience would expect. We received comments that we had a good variety of shots included and that the bass shots and drum shots were effective. Throughout the process the shots I was most pleased with were the shots of the bassist at the beginning of the video. It seems this may be a consensus of views.

Criticism was also given, something which we hopeful to receive to see whether it was fitting with what we had received from the teachers or whether the audience thought something else of what we had created.
On the whole we were pleased to see we received feedback similar to what the teachers had given.  This suggests that there weren't other elements in the video that we had failed to rectify.

One piece of criticism included that of how we could have included a few more shots. Something we did do in the second draft by splitting particular long shots; however it would seem we could have provided a few more; for evidence of our attempts to solve the problem and act on the criticism.

A second piece of criticism we received was that the drumming was  bit soft. Again this was something which we had been told about. However we did rectify this issue in the second draft I personally feel that this is obvious in some of the shots-only some of the shots as we rectified those in the reshoots.

These were the criticisms we received and I'm not disappointed. I'm happy that our video was viewed in a way that suggests it was popular and fitted peoples ideas of what a music video should be.

Saturday, 26 November 2011

Update on Filming- Tuesday 15th November

The filming we did tonight was actually successful. Having created an important shot list by compiling the storyboard with the shots that didn't work in the first draft we realised what we needed to do. We had around 26 shots to re shoot in the evening so time was not to much of an issue. Effective preparation meant we had no issues during the process. Pre charging the battery the night before and having the drums at the location for the day enabled a swift transition from planning to filming.

One issue which arose was the charge of the battery. Despite beginning the evening with a full charge the concurrent use of both live view and being on for long times led to a depletion of battery. However we countered this problem by ensuring the camera was switched off whenever there was a pause in filming. Such as in between shots. By doing this we kept the camera going all night, allowing no problems to the filming schedule.

Overall, I feel this is the most successful nights filming we have completed.

Saturday, 19 November 2011

Equipment Check for second draft

For our filming of the second draft of our music video we are in the fortunate position to have complete control over a good selection of equipment.

Tripod
For the first draft of filming we used a tripod which was a telescope tripod and therefore the base which the camera should connect to was designed differently to one which is bit for cameras in that it has a metal screw which cannot be pushed back into the base, unlike on its photographic counterparts.
However, we now use a camera tripod which has the correct base for the camera we use and has features useful to our filming built into it. An example of these useful features would be that of the spirit level, helping us to ensure a straight shot.
Another bonus I have found from using this new tripod compared to that of our old one is that the new one has thicker legs and is therefore better suited to the outdoor filming that-considering our locations and design of film-suits us better.

Camera
For the first draft of filming we used two cameras to film with. For the garage shots we used Ricky's camera which was suitable to the demands that we had. In someways it was fortunate; it fitted our first draft tripod and therefore allowed us to save time by not having to look for a replacement. Secondly it shot in HD which is vital to our film as nearly all videos are now shot in a form of HD and therefore our video had proof that we using relevant and modern media equipment.
For the Croft Hill shots and the warehouse shots we used an SLR camera; the Canon EOS 500D to be precise. Fortunately for the second draft we have been allowed to use this SLR camera again. This, I feel is good news as I am use to the functions of an SLR and overall, I would argue that it is easier to use than the previous camera. This is mainly because of the manual focus function; allowing us to address the fact that multiple scenes in the garage are out of focus. This SLR allows easy use and therefore helps speed the whole process up; allowing effective time management at no expense to the quality of our video.

Update on Filming on the 18th November 2011

In some ways Friday 17th November was a successful day for filming. We managed to complete the Croft Hill shots on a slightly dark day to aid miss en scene and genre and can now scratch that of our to do list.
However, accompanying this is also a spot of bad news. Unfortunately we unable to get hold of our friends drum set-the same set we used for the last set of garage scenes. In the previous post I commented on how this was all set up in the garage, however unfortunately the same friends phone broke on the Thursday evening and did not get Rhys' incoming calls, therefore we failed to get the drum set again. This leaves us in a position where we must film the garage shots and the warehouse shots before Friday.

I would still argue that the slight stress upon us is not a result of failing within the band to be organised. We have been ten times more organised than the first draft, just unfortunately proceedings have been delayed by numerous moments of bad luck. Such as the Buses not arriving, phones breaking and lifts getting flat tyres.

There is a slight glimmer of good news to be had however. The drum set will be collected tomorrow morning allowing time for it to be set up and therefore for filming to be easily done next week before the deadline, whilst also allowing time for editing.

Friday, 18 November 2011

Shot ammendments needed

We realise that some of our shots do not really work, or fit into the music video very well, so with feedback from our teachers we have decided to change some of the shots.
The following is a list of shots that are going to be changed

  • Shot 7- this shot was originally a shot of the bassist from behind, this shot doesn't really show anything so we have decided to change into a three shot, with all the members of the band present.
  • Shot 17- this shot was originally a high angle shot of the drummer, but it didn't really and showed up some of the garage that wasn't covered by sheets,  we have decided to change this into a three shot
  • Shot 22- this was a behind shot of the bassist but it didn't work so we have decided to put in a three shot of the whole band
  • Shot 30 and 31, these are both close ups of the singer, but we need to re shoot them because the lighting on these two shots differ to much, we want consistency with the colour of the light.
  • Shot 33-we have decided that this shot is to long so we shall be splitting it up into two different shots, one 4.5 second shot of running towards the camera,then another 4.5 second shot of us running away from the camera
  • Shot 36- running shot changed to a three shot
  • shot 37- the shot where the singer jumps over the log, this will now include the other two members
  • Shot 43- changing the panning shot into a shot of an entry into the warehouse, because that shot was missing from the narrative of the warehouse.
  • Shot 44- included all three members now
  • Shot 45- includes all three members of the band now
  • Shot 47- was a mid shot of drummer has now been changed to a three shot
  • Shot 51- The walking shots didn't work so we are changing them to three shots.
  • Shot 52- change to three shot
  • Shot 56- long shot now includes all three members of the band.
  • Shot 58- change walking shot into a normal mid shot
  • Shot 59-change panning shot into a three shot
  • Shot 63- change the panning shot into a three shot
  • Shot 64- change panning shot into three shot
  • Shot 65- change running shot so it includes all three members of the band
  • All singing shots will now be done in the garage
  • Shot 70 all three memebers running out
  • Shot 74 change to a three shot
  • Shot 76- change to a three shot

Update on Filming-Thursday 17th November 2011

We faced some problems when we came to filmng yesterday in that it was non existent. Now This was not our fault. We were unable to film due to the incompetence of our local bus service which left we waiting in the cold expectant for a bus which never arrived.

However it was not all doom and gloom, Rhys and Ricky went on ahead and were able to set the garage up so that we could make the most of our time tonight. This preparation will be helpful as now we can just crakc on with filming.
Our filming of the outside shots is still due to go ahead today, with hopefully filming in the garage will be ectly after. However the garage is now in a position where it can be completed whenever we have free time before Friday next week.

The Outside shots tonight are crucial and must be completed today which is why we are allowing ourselves plenty of time by Starting filming at approximately 14.00.

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

Problems that might occur with filming

We are aware that there may be problems that could occur during the filming of our second draft. These problems must be taken into account if the filming is to be done properly and in a way that will gain the best results.

The first issue that I am most concerned over is that of the weather. When we first filmed our shots at the two outside locations we were fortunate enough to have sunny weather which benefited the lighting of the whole shoot. The weather will not be such a problem for the inside shoot in the warehouse, as the lighting is always the same. However we will need particularly good weather for the Croft hill shoot and thus must plan according to what we are forecasted.

A second problem we might have when filming is acquiring lifts to the locations. This would be a problem as neither of us in the band can drive and are thus receiving lifts to the locations. This won't be a problem if careful planning and preparations are put in in good course.

A problem we faced last time we shot in Rhys's garage was that we did not take into account the length of time it would take to set up and prepare the location to how we wanted it to be. This time we can prepare in good time. Hopefully we can set up the location the night before and thus when we arrive we can just film as we will be filming after school and will not have as much time as before.

Overall, the main thing we must focus on is being prepared. We have to make sure that batteries are charged,tripods are in place and that the location is set up correctly.

Monday, 14 November 2011

Filming Schedule

17/11/11

Re filming some of the garage shots.
Starting at 4:30
  • changing the panning shots into three shots(shots of all three members of the band.
  • Repeat good quality shots with stock shots of the singing part.
  • More emphasis on the same t-shirts.
  • Consistency in lighting needed,for singing shots especially.
  • Make sure misc on scene is consistance throughout the shots.
  • Change walking towards camera shots(not needed)

19/11/11
Re filming some of the croft hill shots, and the warehouse shots
Starting 1:30
  • Re film shots with Just Rupert in, make into three shots and shorten them.
  • Correct narrative flaws
  • Shot of entrance into the warehouse
  • split running shots into two shots, one from the front one from behind


Thursday, 10 November 2011

Justification of Photographs

There was dispute over whether the an image of the bands drummer on the front cover of the digipak was the correct thing to use. The dispute came as the image used was in the correct style and framed the way I wanted the image to be. However it can be seen as slightly unconventional that the drummer be used as the model on the front cover.

However, I felt that the image worked perfectly and have found justification for the use of the this image. This justification comes in the form of the front cover of Low Life by the band New Order. New Order have used there drummer on the front of their album cover and I have come to the conclusion that if an actual band feels that it is correct to do so, I can use the drummer of The Almost Fallen on the front of my digipak cover.


The man shown in this image is Stephen Morris, New Order's drummer.

Monday, 7 November 2011

Photographs

Together, time has been spent on creating photographs for digipaks and magazine adverts so that they can look as effective and professional as possible. There are numerous photographs which If eel presented the genre of The Almost Fallen well, and targeted the target audience effectively. 
I have grown keen on the use of an almost sepia style effect on my photographs, whilst also overlapping a fade effect to give it a real apocalypse vintage feel. Something which we have worked hard on to keep as a running theme throughout the whole creation.















I have posted a number of photographs, some which I have used on my final products and others which came a close second when I was deciding on which to use. The ones I have use-shown using sepia and fade-are ones that I am particularly proud of. I think the framing is the best feature of these photographs and that the look effective when used against my genre of music.
I have chosen to use all warehouse shots despite the fact that I was pleased with some of the forest ones. I did this so that i could retain continuity throughout my digipak. Also I aimed to have continuity from the digipak to the magazine advert.

Friday, 4 November 2011

Music Video Draft evaluation

Having submitted the first draft of our Music Video, I have reflected on what I felt went well during production.

Firstly, our first location worked well. Setting up our equipment early maximised our time to film and it was fortunate that we did this as we soon discovered the camera we planned to use was not working. we used the extra time saved to collect a friends HD camera which was effective and worked well. Location was something that we were going to struggle with as we did not have the means for large amounts of travel. Maximising places close to home was something we did effectively, using Rhys Garage and re creating it into a post apocalypse  scenario.
Something which we will focus on doing through the final draft is ensuring that throughout the filming process we mention at the beginning of a clip which shot it is. I found that through out the first draft editing we had trouble realising which shots were which. Fortunately, via cooperation we put no wrong shots in. The drums were a part I found particular hard, however this is a point which exemplifies the cooperative nature of our work. For this part is where Rhys excelled and we put the correct shots in the correct places.

From the feedback we have been given via our teacher we have recognised areas which we need to improve. For example we have been told that some of our shots within the wood are to long and should have another shot put in perhaps filming from behind. Also we have been told that our film has to many individual shots whereas there should be more quality shots repeated throughout the video.
I feel that this will play to our strengths as we are in the fortunate position of having a HD camera to film on.

We have made amendments on our storyboard; writing what we need to do where.

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

Digipak Draft Feedback

Having received the results of my first digipak draft, I have acknowledge that for myself to progress I must make some serious changes to my work. My draft has provided my with an insight in to my work and I have been shown that my ideas so far do not work whatsoever. I have taken this in my stride and have decided to initiate a transformation of my work. I have decided to go for a simpler option, opting to focus on a handful of specific, professional pieces of work.
I have done this so that I can gather my ideas and take individual parts of each one and alter it until it fits my own design. I feel that completely re doing my digipak was realistically my only option. The constructive criticism I have received has helped point me in the direction that my work must go in to achieve the grades I want.

So far, my inspiration has mainly come from the Bombay Bicycle Club album Flaws reasons for this include how simplistic it is. This simplicity I have opted for was inevitable to avoid as I am using work such as Jack Johnson and more alternative artists.


My last draft consisted of work I branded simplistic due to its look. However the feedback told me and showed my how cluttered my work was and how the images didn't fit well enough. My final draft will consist of a simple typography, layout and design. Much like the pieces of work I have decided to use as inspiration.